GIS to HMS:
An Investigation of the Midwest Flood of 1993
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ddb4a/ddb4aec493f26079de800da902391ee5c65c11f8" alt="" |
Project Outline |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ddb4a/ddb4aec493f26079de800da902391ee5c65c11f8" alt="" |
- Introduction
- Objectives
- Scope of Study
- Project Overview
- Background
- The Great Flood of 1993
- Affected areas
- Resulting problems
- Associated damages and costs
- Floodplain management
- Impacts
- Future needs
- HEC Hydrologic Modeling System
- Purpose
- Features
- Model basin runoff
- Model river routing
- Produce hydrographs
- Inputs
- Basin parameters
- Precipitation parameters
- Control specifications
- Outputs
- Hydrographs
- Tables
- Problems
- Tedious manual entry
- Complicated/large basins difficult to input
- No quality control of terrain model
- Geographic Information Systems
- Definition
- Uses in surface water hydrology
- Database management
- Creation of data sets
- Geographic distribution of data
- Quality control
- Graphic presentation
- Benefits
- Study Area: Upper Cedar River Basin
- Boundaries
- Reasons for selection
- Small for analysis purposes
- Heavily flooded region
- Availability of data
- Application to larger areas
- Stream and Watershed Delineation
- Digital Elevation Model Processing
- Flow Direction Grid
- Flow Accumulation Grid
- Stream and Watershed Delineation
- Threshold value
- Stream links
- One-to-one relationship
- Watershed Delineation Tool
- Dangling polygons
- Pre-merged watersheds
- Point watershed delineation
- Accuracy of GIS Model
- Hydrologic Parameters
- Basin Parameters
- Initial Abstractions
- Percent Impervious
- SCS Curve Numbers
- Slope
- Lag Time
- Stream Parameters
- Muskingum X
- Muskingum K
- Muskingum Steps
- Creation of Region Model
- Region Network: HECPREPRO
- Basins, Reaches, Nodes
- Connectivity
- Attribute Transfer
- Purpose
- Problems
- Format of numerical data
- Transfer of string attibutes into reach files
- Numbering system (HECPREPRO labels vs. Gridcodes)
- Creation of Precipitation Model
- Precipitation Data
- Daily average station values
- DSS
- Distribution
- Thiessen Network (ArcView)
- Point coverage of precipitation stations
- Thiessen method
- Assumptions
- Weighting Coefficients
- Calculation of coefficients in ArcView
- Assumptions
- Accuracy of Model
- Comprehensive Hydrologic Model
- HMS Inputs
- Basin Model
- HMS schematic
- Basin characteristics
- Precipitation Model
- Relationship between subbasins and gages
- Navigation and interpretation of DSS file
- Control Specifications
- HMS Outputs
- Hydrographs for Basin Outlets
- Hydrographs at Stream Junctions
- Problems
- Muskingum Routing
- Inaccurate X values
- Small reaches
- Muskingum step intervals
- Time Steps
- Computational vs. data
- Time step compared to lag time
- Accuracy of Model
- Comparison to imported hydrographs from flow stations
- Results
- Conclusions
- Link between GIS and HMS
- Evaluation of Hydrologic Model
- Applications
- Future Work
- Refine Parameters
- Application to Entire Midwest Region